These are the Health and Social Care Delivery Research (HSDR) Programme, guidance notes for applicants submitting a Stage 1 application to the via the REsearch Awards Lifecycle Management System (REALMS).
The ‘Add New Ticket’ button towards the top of the screen can be used to raise a support ticket if you have any questions relating to the call or completion of the online application form.
Please regularly press the ‘Save Draft’ button, found towards the bottom of the screen to save your progress.
Summary information
Contracting Organisation
Please give details of the organisation who will be the contractor if the project is funded. If the organisation you require does not appear in the search box, you can request to add a new contracting organisation.
Research Title (Limit: 300 characters)
The project title should state clearly and concisely the proposed research. Any abbreviations should be spelled out in full.
Research Type
Select the appropriate research type. If your proposed project includes any element of primary research, please select ‘Primary Research’. If you are carrying out new analysis/synthesis of existing data, select ‘Secondary Research’ or 'Evidence Synthesis' as appropriate. If you are not sure which category to select, choose the closest match to your project as this can be adjusted later.
Start Month
Note this should be from 1st of the month regardless of whether this is a working day or not. Please be realistic about your possible start date taking account of the necessary contracting, and staff recruitment prior to starting your project.
Start Year
Please be realistic about your possible start date taking account of the necessary contracting, and staff recruitment prior to starting your project.
Research Duration (months)
Ensure you include sufficient time to complete all aspects of the research including applications for regulatory approvals (where required) and the final report.
End date
This field will automatically populate once you have saved the research duration information.
Estimated Research costs
Enter the total amount of research costs requested (not including NHS Support & Treatment costs). Please ensure that any costs attributable to higher education institutions (HEIs) are included here at 80% of the full economic cost, which is the rate at which these costs will be awarded.
Estimated NHS Support Costs
Enter the total amount of NHS support costs associated with this proposal. NHS support costs are the participant care costs which will not continue after the end of the study, and can usually be claimed in connection with NHS and non-NHS research.
Estimated NHS Excess Treatment Costs
Enter the total amount of NHS excess treatment costs associated with this proposal. NHS excess treatment costs are the additional costs or savings associated with the treatment of the participants during the research. The costs included are the additional costs compared with the current cost of standard care, which would continue to be incurred after the research, should the treatment become standard care in the future.
Information is available on how to access excess treatment costs
Estimated Non-NHS Excess Treatment Costs
Enter the total amount of non-NHS excess treatment costs associated with this proposal. Non-NHS excess treatment costs include costs incurred in delivering the treatment, or intervention, which would continue to be incurred after the trial, should the intervention become standard care. The figure that should be entered here is the difference between the cost of the intervention and the cost of current standard care. Please note that NIHR have no provision to cover non-NHS excess treatment costs, and it is the responsibility of the applicant to secure these costs if they are needed. Where applicable a letter from the provider of the excess treatment costs for the purposes of the study should be supplied.
These are similar to NHS excess treatment costs, but they mainly apply to Public Health and Social Care Research. They are unlikely to be applicable to HTA unless the intervention is being delivered outside the NHS (e.g. in school or by a local authority etc.).
Further information is available with the AcoRD guidance on how to allocate the costs of your proposal to each of the above categories.
Research Team
Lead Applicant Research Bacgrounds
Information on your name, Degrees and Professional Qualifications, Affiliated Organisations and contact details will be automatically populated from your contact profile. Update your contact profile to complete any missing information or make any updates here.
Equality and Diversity Monitoring Information
NIHR is committed to promoting equality, diversity and inclusion in research and asks applicants to provide Equality and Diversity Monitoring Information (age, sex, ethnicity and race, and disability). By answering these Equality and Diversity Monitoring Information questions, you will help us to better understand the different groups of people that apply to us for funding and their experiences of the funding process – particularly the groups protected by UK equality legislation. Although it is mandatory to answer these questions, it is possible to select “prefer not to say” as a response. However, the more information you provide, the more effective our monitoring will be. This information will not be used to make decisions about funding.
Research Team
The Research Team table will update automatically as Joint Lead Applicants and Co-Applicants are added. Use the update button to enter the following information:
- Role (Limit 200 characters) – Explain the role that the applicants will be undertaking in the research, e.g co-ordination and project management, analysis, methodological input etc.
- Commitment – percentage of the applicant’s time that will be committed to this project (%FTE).
- Organisation – Select the primary organization for the purpose of this application from the organization that the co-applicant is affiliated with.
- Department – Select the primary department affiliated with.
Joint Lead Applicant
Where appropriate use the envelope button to add and then invite a Joint Lead applicant to your application. Once the Joint Lead Applicant has accepted their invitation they will appear in the Research Team table, and their information can be added as above.
Co-Applicants
Use the ‘Add Co-Applicants' button to add any Co-applicants and provide the necessary information, including contact details, organization, role and commitment (%FTE). You should consult with co-applicants before adding them to the application. Do not include collaborators, who should be mentioned (if necessary) in the Research Plan section of the on-line application form.
Co-applicants are those individuals with responsibility for the day to day management and delivery of the project. Co-applicants are considered part of the project team and are expected to share responsibility for its successful delivery. Collaborators normally provide specific expertise on particular aspects of the project but who do not share in the responsibility for the delivery of the project.
For further information please access the 'Public Co-Applicants in Research' guidance
PPI lead
The role of the PPI lead can be undertaken by any of the co-applicants within the research team (or a named member of the team), who has the relevant skills, experience and authority to be accountable, represent, manage and embed patient and public involvement in all aspects of the research study/programme. This role should be a budgeted and resourced research team member. For examples of the activities a PPI lead might be accountable for.
Add Administrative Contact
This facility allows you to provide an alternative contact(s) who will also have access to the application but will not be able to submit it when complete.
The Lead Applicant must submit the completed application and will still receive all emails automatically generated through the system.
Use the envelope icon below to enter the Administrative Contact's details and invite them to participate in this application.
Application Details
Plain English Summary of Research (Limit: 3,500 characters)
The importance of a plain English summary
A plain English summary is a clear explanation of your research.
Many reviewers use this summary to inform their review of your funding application. They include clinicians and other practitioners and researchers who do not have specialist knowledge of your field as well as members of the public. If your application for funding is successful, the summary will be used on NIHR and other websites.
A good quality plain English summary providing an easy to read overview of your whole study will help:
- those carrying out the review (reviewers and committee members) to have a better understanding of your research proposal
- inform others about your research such as members of the public, health and social care professionals, policy makers and the media
- the research funders to publicise the research that they fund.
If it is felt that your plain English summary is not clear and of a good quality, then you may be required to amend it prior to final funding approval.
It is helpful to involve patients / carers / service users / practitioners and members of the public in developing a plain English summary.
Content
When writing your summary consider including the following information where appropriate:
- aim(s) of the research
- background to the research
- design and methods used
- patient and public involvement
- dissemination.
The plain English summary is not the same as a scientific abstract - please do not cut and paste this or other sections of your application form to create the plain English summary.
Further guidance on writing a plain English summary is available on the NIHR website.
For further support and advice on writing a plain English summary, please contact your local Research Design Service (where applicable).
Research Plan (Limit 20,000 characters)
Using all the headings (in the order presented) and guidance below, please use this section to clearly explain your proposed research. As this is the main part of your application which will be considered by the reviewing committee you should ensure that the information is accurate, succinct and clearly laid out. The overall amount of information that you can provide at this stage is limited to 4 pages (Limit: 20,000 characters)
The NIHR expects appropriate and relevant involvement of patients/service users, carers and the public and other key stakeholders in the research it supports. It is essential to set out your plans to involve patients/service users, carers and the public in the Stage 1 application. Your involvement plans will be assessed by the prioritisation/funding committee including patient/service users, carers and public members.
Information and resources to assist you can be found on the INVOLVE website, including Briefing notes for researchers on how to involve patients/service users, carers and the public, including definition of involvement engagement and participation; and payments guidance for researchers and professionals with information on budgeting for involvement.
In this section it is important that you identify all stakeholders who are relevant to your research proposal. For each stakeholder group you need to be clear about how they benefit from your proposed research and, where appropriate, how they have been involved in the development of the application, as well as the plans for their involvement in the proposed research.
If this HSDR application is a resubmission for which you previously received feedback, please explain what you learned and how the application has improved.
If this HSDR application is pending a decision from another funder please give details of the funder and the expected decision date.
NIHR will not accept the same or substantially similar applications to more than one NIHR programme. If two similar applications are submitted, once the overlap is identified, the application that is most advanced through the funding process will continue and the second will not be taken further.
Similar applications will only be considered by two programmes concurrently if:
• the aims and research proposals are substantially different
• if successful, NIHR would be prepared to fund both proposals
• the successful delivery of one project is not dependent on the other
Guidance for applicants on equality, diversity and inclusion for study participants
Every person eligible to take part in research should be offered the same opportunity of taking part in that research regardless of:
- Geographical location
- Age
- Disability
- Gender reassignment
- Marriage and civil partnership
- Pregnancy and maternity
- Ethnicity - useful links (for example) to: The toolkit for increasing participation of BAME groups in health and care research
The INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework, which aims to improve trial delivery for under-served groups - Religion or belief
- Sex
- Sexual orientation
- Socioeconomic status
- Access to health or social care
All NIHR applications are expected to include information about how this data will be collected.
In addition, applicants should demonstrate how these factors have been considered and addressed in their proposal, including steps taken to ensure the research sample is representative of the population the study is targeted at. Applicants need to explain who they are planning to recruit to ensure inclusivity of study participants and justify and explain any exclusions, for example by completing an Equality Impact Assessment. Additionally, applicants should demonstrate that all potential recruiting locations have been considered and the research is deliverable to those areas.
Please see the NIHR INCLUDE Guidance for more information about how to include under-served groups effectively:
NIHR INCLUDE Guidance (General)
Helpful links:
Promoting equality, diversity and inclusion in research
What is the problem being addressed?
Provide a clear explanation of the health or social care problem to be addressed, the impact on patients/service users, carers, as well as health and care services, and how this research would fill a demonstrable evidence gap.
Explain how your proposed research is within the remit of the HSDR programme, specifying how it addresses the key aim of the programme to produce rigorous and relevant evidence on the quality, access and organisation of health and care services.
Why is this research important in terms of improving the health and/or wellbeing of the public and/or to patients and health and care services?
It is essential that you clearly identify the health and care need your research meets or contributes to. Please outline the anticipated value or contribution the study will provide.
The HSDR classification of need for research is set out below:
- Health/Care need: How will the public/patients see this as a need and as a potential improvement to their health and/or lives? There will be benefits in terms of improving health for the public, patients, service users and/or carers. This covers the potential for preventing avoidable mortality and morbidity, improving quality of life and considerations of disease prevention. For example, research in this area is likely to identify new ways of working that enhance opportunities for health promotion or quality and safety of care. Benefits may also arise from improving the acceptability and effectiveness of care, cost effectiveness to the NHS (or social care), better targeting of services or equity of access to care.
- Expressed need: The existence of an expressed need for the research in the health and care management community, and evidence that it is, or will be, highly relevant and important to the needs of the NHS (or social care You should consider and demonstrate “What evidence is there that patients/service users and the service want the answer to this question and why will they will want to act on the outcomes of the research?”
- Sustained interest and intent: Evidence that the issue or area is one in which there will be sustained interest in the future, such that the results of research once commissioned and undertaken will remain highly relevant and important to the needs of the NHS and/or care in the future. Researcher-led applications addressing areas of ongoing need, such as NIHR and HS&DR highlight notices and recent NIHR Themed calls should reference this fact in their proposal (under this heading).
- Capacity to generate new knowledge: The existence of uncertainty or “knowledge gaps” which cannot be addressed by the existing body of research in this area and that require new research.
- Generalisable findings and prospects for change: Research in this area is likely to produce generalisable or transferable findings of value to the health and care management community, which health and care organisations are likely to be able to use in their decision-making in ways that bring about change and improvement.
- Building on existing work: Research contributes to building a coherent body of knowledge in the area, and may build on, but not duplicate, previous research.
Review of existing evidence - How does the existing literature support this proposal?
Explain why this research is needed now, both in terms of time and relevance. We will only fund primary research where the proposed research is informed by a review of the existing evidence.
- Commissioned calls: where the request for research to address a specific research question is via a commissioning brief advertised through a commissioned call, a review of the existing evidence will have already been undertaken by the funding NIHR Programme to inform the commissioning brief. Therefore, applicants intending to undertake a systematic evidence review as part of their research should build on and not duplicate the evidence review that will have already been undertaken. Applications in response to commissioned calls will need to address the commissioning brief requirements specific to the NIHR Programme.
- Researcher-led calls: for researcher-led or researcher-initiated proposals that include primary research then they should include reference to the existing evidence and explain how this evidence has informed the proposed research. Where an existing systematic review summarises the available evidence this should be referenced, as well as including reference to any relevant literature published subsequent to that systematic review. Where no such systematic review exists, it is expected that the applicants will undertake an appropriate review of the currently available and relevant evidence (using as appropriate a predetermined and described methodology that normally systematically identifies, critically appraises and then synthesises the available evidence) and then present a summary of the findings of this in their proposal. All applicants must also include reference to relevant on-going studies, e.g. from trial registries.
All proposals recommended for funding which involve a clinical trial will be double-checked for potential overlaps using WHO trials before the communication of any funding decision. Consequently, a funding recommendation may not be taken forward if a major overlap is identified at this stage. It is therefore important that applicants highlight any potential overlaps prior to consideration by the funding committee.
Applicants should then explain how they expect that the research proposed will add to the body of knowledge with reference to current health and social care policy and practice.
What is the research question / aims and objectives?
Please summarise the research question / key aims and objectives.
HSDR funds research projects, not programmes of work or ongoing work. You must have clearly defined research questions, and aims and objectives, and describe how the planned methodology is likely to achieve these objectives.
Project Plan
Provide an expert summary of the project plan of investigation plus any additional points required to support statements made in the previous sections, and include any key references required to justify the points made (e.g. in the use of particular outcome measures or methods of analysis).
- Design: Please provide a clear summary of the type of study design to be used (e.g. Primary research: controlled trial; Evidence synthesis: systematic review), including methods, proposed sample and analysis methods, and explain why you have chosen the proposed methodology. You should also upload a flow diagram (single-side of A4), as a separate PDF file, for submission with your application form as appropriate. This should illustrate the study design and the flow of participants (if appropriate). If the project consists of more than one work package, consider a diagram that conveys the sequence and timing of research packages as well as how the work packages are linked. For qualitative work it may be appropriate to set out your theoretical framework.
- Team: Please list and explain the role of key collaborators involved in the research, as well as any patient/service user, carer and public leads (not previously listed as co-applicants).The team should be multidisciplinary and include relevant expertise in the clinical area concerned, in performing systematic reviews, and (where appropriate) others e.g. operational research, PPI lead, public voice with lived experience, health economics. Particular care should be used to describe how you have and will involve patients and the public in your research. There should be a named person with appropriate skills and experience who is responsible for leading the PPI element within the project. This role should be an adequately costed and resourced research team member who is able to manage the PPI plans and related activities. Examples of the activities a PPI lead might undertake are available.
- Dissemination: Our key concern is to ensure that projects funded by the HSDR programme are designed from the outset to produce useful, timely and relevant research findings, which are then used and actually make a difference. Please describe the main knowledge products or outputs from your research and how they will be presented, disseminated and used. It is important to include details of how you will share with study participants the progress and findings of the study. Explain how the findings from the proposed research will be shared with or disseminated to others and how this will maximise the potential impact of the proposed research. Describe who are the likely beneficiaries of the research, when are they likely to benefit and in what ways, and describe how the knowledge will be translated into the real world. You can further information on How to disseminate your research: Getting your message heard - and used.
- PPI – Patient and Public Involvement: The NIHR expects appropriate and and well-designed involvement of patients/service users, carers and the public and other key stakeholders in the research it supports. In the Stage 1 application, it is essential to show your plans for involving patients/service user, carers and the public at each appropriate stage of the research project lifecycle. For example, sitting on oversight committees, being a member of the research team involved in activities such as recruitment, data collection, analysis, producing study materials and sharing findings. Your PPI (patient and public involvement) plans will be assessed by the funding committee which includes patient and public members. In the rare circumstances where PPI is not appropriate, a clear justification must be provided. You should also outline how PPI has informed the development of the project so far. For example, the involvement of patients/service user, carers or the public in shaping the research question and study design. These activities could include the development of feasible, relevant and acceptable recruitment plans, data collection tools, information materials, outcome measures, follow-up, intervention design and delivery. For a Stage 2 application, you will be asked how the PPI will be managed, reported and evaluated so whilst it is not necessary to provide the detail in Stage 1, early consideration should be given to these aspects. You can find further resources to support the design of your PPI.
- Expected Impact: Use this section to provide information about the impact you anticipate the study may have. We acknowledge that defining impact can be challenging and paths to impact are complex with many steps beyond your control. We therefore define impact broadly as the contribution, effect on, or benefit that excellent research makes to knowledge, people, health and care, the NHS, health and care services, society or the economy. We wish to understand the ways in which the proposed research will change activity, attitudes, awareness, behaviour, capacity, opportunity, performance, decision- making, practice or processes. Impact can also result from new understanding that benefits individuals, population, organisations, communities, constituencies or the nation.
- We expect that all researchers who have a contract with the NIHR to undertake research shall ensure that the outcome of the research is prepared as a research paper for publication in a suitable peer- reviewed journal. We would also encourage all researchers to disseminate their research findings to the broader public as well as to the research participants / health and care management community (as appropriate) when the study has completed.
- Multiple long-term conditions - Studies within a project (where applicable): The HSDR Programme would like to encourage researchers to consider a multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) - Studies Within A Project (SWAP) perspective in their projects. This is to further understanding on MLTC, and improve knowledge on the best methods and processes for incorporating MLTC research questions into complex projects (including clinical trials) in health, social care and public health. Applicants can propose an embedded study within a project (SWAP) which would support this. The study would be short and efficient, with findings put into the public domain as soon as they are available, as an interim output. A SWAP will be a small part of the overall application and should be costed at no more than £30,000 to include all dissemination and publication associated with the SWAP. At stage 1 applicants should indicate if they intend to include a SWAP in their study. A detailed description of the SWAP is not required at this stage.
Uploads
Attachment 1: flow diagram
Finally, please create a flow diagram (single-side of A4), as a separate PDF file, for submission with your application form. This should illustrate the study design and the flow of participants. Applicants should also describe complex interventions and controls as accurately and fully as possible within their diagram. If proposing an RCT, we advise you refer to the CONSORT statement and website for guidance. Alternatively, you may find the EQUATOR Network website useful. The PDF file should be submitted along with your application form.
Attachment 2: references
One single-side A4 page, listing references used throughout your proposal is also a mandatory PDF upload. Please use either the Vancouver or Harvard referencing conventions.
Acknowledgements and Conflicts
Potential Conflicts
Please declare any conflicts or potential conflicts of interest that you or your co-applicants may have in undertaking this research, including any relevant, non-personal & commercial interest that could be perceived as a conflict of interest.
Agreement to terms and conditions
I have read and understood the terms on which I have been nominated as Chief Investigator for this proposal along with the associated documentation and accept this role.
A list of terms and conditions can be found here: Terms and Conditions
Checklist of information to include when submitting a NIHR stage 1 research application
Applicants should ensure they have included the necessary information prior to submitting their application.
- A good quality Plain English Summary
- A clear explanation of the problem being addressed
- A clear demonstration of the need and importance of the research
- A review of existing literature (primary research)
- A clear research question / aim(s) and objectives
- A clear project plan summarising the study design and methods
- A clear description of team member roles and contribution
- Appropriate and relevant involvement of patients/service user, carers and the public
- A clear, appropriate and relevant plan for dissemination
- A flow diagram illustrating the study design / flow of participants (document upload)
- One single-side A4 page of references, using either the Vancouver or Harvard referencing conventions (document upload)