Systematic reviews identify, evaluate, combine and summarise the findings of all relevant individual studies, to provide decision makers with the best possible information about the effects of tests, treatments and other interventions used in health and social care.
The Systematic Reviews Programme is funded by the NIHR, with contributions from the Chief Scientist Office (CSO) in Scotland, Health and Care Research Wales, and the HSC R&D Division, Public Health Agency in Northern Ireland.
We support the production of systematic reviews through three funding streams:
For those producing reviews, we also offer the following:
Cochrane UK provides training and support to Cochrane entities and contributors to the Cochrane Collaboration in the UK, Ireland, and internationally.
Two work-streams focus on “learning & development” and “engagement” with a research programme supporting these activities. Learning and development opportunities are provided for a broad range of key NHS stakeholders including patients and the public; healthcare workers; and policy makers and commissioners, these activities forming an important part of the engagement strategy.
Cochrane UK is a key link between the Collaboration, the Cochrane reviews and the National Health Service, and promotes evidence-based decision-making and systematic reviews in general and Cochrane reviews in particular. For more information see the Cochrane UK's Annual Reports.
The NIHR funds the infrastructure costs for the 21 Cochrane Review Groups (CRG) listed below. We manage the contracts of these groups on behalf of the NIHR. A full list of the groups, their contact details and further information can be found on the Cochrane Library. NIHR has also funded a two-year pilot of Network Support Fellows working within the newly-formed Cochrane Networks.
The Complex Review Support Unit provides specialist expert advice to those producing reviews, of complex methodology.
The unit is made up of collaboration between the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Leicester University and lead by the University of Glasgow, providing advice on methodological fields such as Diagnostic Test Accuracy, Network Meta-Analysis, Individual Patient Data/Clinical Study Report Meta-Analysis, Causal Pathway Analysis, Economic Evaluations, Non-randomised studies, Prognostic reviews, Prevalence reviews, Realist synthesis, Qualitative Analysis and Use of routine data.
To access this support, please complete and submit a proforma application. The proposed review must already have secured funding. Applications will be reviewed on an ad-hoc basis, but no less than every six months and will be measured against the following criteria:
To assess the applications the Systematic Reviews Programme receives, a number of people are involved. This is to ensure that the application selection is carried out in a way that embraces the latest expertise, knowledge and opinion. Selection is done through three funding panels: the Cochrane NHS-Engagement Awards Funding Panel; the Programme Grants Funding Panel; and the Cochrane Incentive Awards Funding Panel.
Find out more about becoming a reviewer or a Committee member.
The SRPAG meets a maximum of twice a year for the purpose of advising the Programme Director on policy associated with the provision of support for the completion of systematic reviews, evidence synthesis and the future development for the NIHR-funded entities. Current funded entities include: Cochrane UK, the Cochrane Review Groups. The SRPAG also seeks to ensure all programmes of work are of scientific quality, relevant to the National Health Service and show value for money through the management of annual reporting and monitoring. View list of members.
Members of Systematic Reviews Programme Advisory Group and Funding Committees are required to declare any interests which conflict, or may be considered to conflict, with SRP business, or may be perceived as influencing decisions made in the course of their work within SRP. All members are asked to complete the Register of Interest form, which is intended to capture long term predictable interests that could be perceived to lead to conflicts of interest. These and other interests are judged on a case by case basis at individual meetings.
Telephone: 023 8059 4241
Telephone: 023 8059 4241
The Systematic Reviews Programme manages the contracts for the nine NIHR Technology Assessment Reviews (TAR) research teams. The teams respond to the urgent needs of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and other policy makers. We work with NICE and the teams to manage the allocation of the topics on their call off contract. Find out more about our work with NICE.
NICE’s role is to improve the outcomes for people using the NHS and other public health and social care services. One of the ways it does this is by producing evidence-based guidance. NICE guidance contains systematically-developed recommendations based on the best evidence.
The TAR research teams provide NICE with the independent research it needs to inform their guidance committees through a variety of different types of specialised report suited to the decision making process.
TAR reviews can also be commissioned to provide evidence for other policy customers. The TAR teams can respond quickly to requests, providing an important resource for policy makers, such as the National Screening Committee, Chief Medical Officer and NHS England. TAR reports are independent, reliable and rigorous evidence assessments; they usually comprise a systematic review, cost-effectiveness and economic modelling.
The nine TAR teams are:
The team can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org
Cochrane Review Authors can apply to have their reviews published under Gold open access, meaning that they are instantly and freely open for all users to access on the Cochrane Library from the date of publication.
News: Top 10 priorities for oral and dental health research published
News: Spotlight on social care and social work research
News: Review finds more effective drugs to stop bleeding after childbirth
Minutes and actions from the Systematic Reviews Advisory Group meeting
Guidance for public contributors commenting on NIHR funding proposals to the Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR), Health Technology Assessment (HTA), Public Health Research (PHR) and Systematic Reviews (SR) Programmes.
List of members of the Systematic Reviews Programme Advisory Group.
List of reviewers for the Systematic Reviews Programme.
A guidance document for external peer reviewers commenting from a professional persepctive on funding proposals