Public Health Research

Unstructured activities (play) for children and young people

Overview

  • Opportunity status:
    Open
  • Type:
    Programme
  • Opening date:
  • Closing date:
  • Reference ID:
    2024/210

Ready to apply?

Apply for this funding opportunity through our online application form

Our Public Health Research (PHR) Programme is looking to fund research which evaluates interventions that work to increase and sustain unstructured activities (or play opportunities) for children and young people. 

This is a two-stage, commissioned funding opportunity. To apply for the first stage you should submit an Outline Application. If invited to the second stage, you will then need to complete a Full Application.

Eligibility

Please see our PHR Programme page and the research specification for further detail on what we will fund.  

Key dates

28 November 2024

Outline Application opening date

11 February 2025

Webinar 

25 April 2025

Outline Application closing date

Mid May 2025

Notification of decline decision if out of remit or non-competitive

Early July 2025

Outline Application shortlisting decision

Early July 2025

Full Application opening date

End August 2025

Full application closing date

November 2025

Full Application decision

Studies within a trial or review

This funding opportunity is eligible for a SWAT/SWAR (study within a trial or study within a review), which can help significantly improve methodology of future research as well as the host study. Find out about the benefits of SWATs/SWARs and how to include one in your application.

Webinar

We are holding a webinar to support applicants seeking to apply to this funding opportunity and our other commissioned funding opportunities closing on the same date. This will be held on Tuesday 11 February 2025, 1:15pm to 2:30pm, and will focus on each funding opportunity as well as general tips for applying. There will be a Q&A at the end. Please complete our online form to sign up.

Funding applications must be submitted via our Awards Management System. Click the link below to log in to the system and start your application.

Apply now

Research specification

Research question

  • What interventions work to increase and sustain unstructured activities (or play opportunities) for children and young people?

Unstructured activities cover a wide range of play activities, as well as ‘activities of daily life’. Unstructured activities are often referred to as active play in younger children, but for older children unstructured time spent being active engaging with games and/or hobbies, whilst still play, is often not referred to as such. Throughout this funding opportunity we use both terms (active play and unstructured activities). There are many different types of play alongside active play (locomotor play), such as imaginative play and creative play. Play has a range of benefits, including supporting the cognitive, physical, social, and emotional well-being of children. Through play children learn the skills needed to develop resilience, and this in turn helps children to build healthy relationships. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, article 31 reads "States Parties recognise the right of the child to rest and leisure, to engage in play and recreational activities appropriate to the age of the child and to participate freely in cultural life and the arts". This funding opportunity will mainly focus on informal active play in all children, including older children, teenager and young people, however the Public Health Research (PHR) Programme would welcome research on any type of unstructured activities/play.  

Children need time for active play and to move their bodies as an essential part of healthy development. Active play is one of the easiest and most natural ways that children can get the recommended levels of physical activity, and active play maybe one of the best forms of physical activity for children as it is what children want to do. Play also develops physical literacy. The importance of play and recreation in the life of every child has long been acknowledged. Active play includes activities such as kicking a ball in the garden or park, playing in the playground, family splash-time at a swimming pool or playing hide and seek. Additionally, unstructured activity (or ‘activities of daily life’) could include family bike rides (leisure rides, as opposed to commuter rides) or family hikes. Research has shown that children enjoy being active with their family. Family-based approaches emphasise that families live in complex systems in which multiple interactions occur simultaneously. 

Although active play can take place both indoors and outdoors, outdoor active play gives the opportunity to experience freedom, practice fine and gross motor skills, including  boisterous movements and to connect with others in nature. Outdoor play also has the added benefits of exposure to sunlight and fresh air, which further contributes to children’s healthy development. For centuries children had the freedom to roam in their local area from an early age, however this has lessened, and it is no longer common for children to have the opportunity to ‘roam freely’ without adults. The dominance of cars has increased and roads can be dangerous, moreover, access to playground and greenspaces has declined, particularly in more deprived areas. With more indoor, isolated lives, older children and young people, especially, often replace active play and face-to-face social interaction by accessing their social life via digital devices. All of this has combined to make children more sedentary, isolated, unhealthy and unhappy.  

Under half of children and young people UK-wide are meeting the Chief Medical Officers’ guidelines of 60 minutes or more of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity per day. Girls, children and young people of Black and Asian ethnicities, and those from less affluent families are even less likely to meet this guideline. This survey however only included structured physical activity, and there is limited data on unstructured activities in children (e.g. play, walking, cycling). The potential for unstructured activities to contribute towards increased physical activity levels may be substantial, especially for families with lower incomes.  

The PHR Programme recognises that interventions aimed at unstructured activities may overlap with active travel. A call for research on Active Travel has recently been advertised on the Programme’s website. Although applications with clear links between active play and active travel may be relevant to this funding opportunity, for example where the journey to a greenspace is by active travel, we would encourage applicants to also review the Active Travel call specification and consider which funding opportunity is more suitable for their application. Applications to the researcher-led workstream are also welcome at any time.  

The PHR Programme wishes to commission research on the health impact of interventions aimed at influencing children’s participation in active play. The programme is predominantly interested in the evaluation of interventions operating at a population level rather than at an individual level, and their impact on health inequalities and the wider determinants of health. The PHR Programme recognises that interventions are likely to impact different (sub)populations in different ways. Applicants should explain and justify their choice of (sub)population. 

Of particular importance to the PHR Programme is an understanding of inequalities in the impact of interventions on people from ethnic minority backgrounds and other vulnerable risk groups in the UK. 

The programme recognises that this funding opportunity is broad, but we invite researchers to be targeted in their chosen research area. 

Suggested research areas of interest could include (but are not limited to) an evaluation of:

  • interventions aimed at tackling the inequalities experienced by different socio-demographic groups in the amount of time spent on unstructured activities and/or active play by children 
  • research comparing structured activity interventions to unstructured activity interventions
  • interventions aimed at increasing active play and/or unstructured activities  for children with disabilities and other underserved groups 
  • how effective interventions are at tackling cultural preferences for, and perceptions of active play and/or unstructured activities and green spaces according to different socio-demographic factors, including gender, age, ethnicity, and culture of both the children and their parents
  • local green space design (e.g. parks and playgrounds), quality and management to reduce access and accessibility inequalities to active play and/or unstructured activities, and to meet the needs of local families, including considerations of cultural and community needs
  • the access to and accessibility of unstructured activities and/or active play interventions, including barriers independent travel to local space interventions and considering the perception of safety (e.g. safe playgrounds/parks)
  • how context specific living, such as for example apartment living, rural/urban etc. has an impact on interventions aimed to increase active play and/or unstructured activities in children.

A range of study designs and outcome measures can be used. Researchers will need to clearly justify the choice of and describe the population group targeted (e.g. the age range of the children), as well as justify the most suitable methodological approach. Primary outcomes must be health related. Outcomes measures of interest include, but not limited to, physical activity, improved health and wellbeing, mental health, gross and fine motor skills. The programme would also be interested in secondary outcomes, such as learning social skills and risk management, however the primary outcome must be healthy related. Researchers are encouraged to consider other outcome measures that may be influential on policy makers as secondary outcome measures. All key outcome measures should be justified, and researchers need to specify how the outcomes will be measured in the medium and long term. It is recognised that the health outcome of interest may only be achieved later in the children’s lifecourse, and researchers will need to specify and justify any proxy health measures used. 

Understanding the value of public health interventions - whether the outcomes justify their use of resources - is integral to the PHR Programme, where resources relating to different economic sectors and budgets are potentially relevant.  The main outcomes for economic evaluation are expected to include health (including health-related quality of life) and the impact on health inequalities as a minimum, with consideration of broader outcomes welcomed. Different approaches to economic evaluation are encouraged as long as they assess the value and distributive impact of interventions.  Applications that do not include an economic component should provide appropriate justification.

We welcome partnerships between research active and other less active institutions and those located in geographical areas of deprivation.

Researchers are encouraged to explain how they will share their findings with policy makers, public health officers, special interest groups, charities, community audiences and other relevant stakeholders. Researchers are expected to be aware of other studies in this area, development in practice and ensure their proposed research is complementary. 

Application guidance

Please read our Domestic Outline Application guidance to help you complete all aspects of your application. You must read this alongside the information below, which details specific requirements our PHR Programme looks for in applications. You can also check our PHR Programme page for details about the Programme’s scope and remit. 

Research Plan

Your Research Plan must be a maximum of four A4 pages. Please include the following when writing your Research Plan.

Methodology/plan

Include the below detail in your methodology/plan:

Please provide the precise aims and research questions your project will address, justifying these by referencing relevant literature. You may like to present these in a PICOST format (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome/s, Setting and Timing).

Summarise your project plan plus any additional points required to support statements made in the previous sections of your application. Include any key references required to justify the points made (for example the use of particular outcome measures or methods of analysis). 

References

Please upload one page of references in the ‘Uploads’ section of the application.

Research design

  • for primary research: clearly summarise your study design. Include all of its components (for example primary and secondary outcomes, process and economic evaluations) and relevant time points for baseline and follow-up data collection for each component. You should reference established research techniques, providing details of how exposure to the intervention will be determined or defined. You should fully explain and justify any adaptations of these for the purposes of the research proposed
  • for evidence synthesis: if you are proposing a systematic review and/or an evidence synthesis, you should provide details regarding the size of the available literature base, along with details of the search and review strategy

If your application proposes to carry out feasibility and/or pilot studies or is staged (for example, full effectiveness evaluations with a built in pilot phase), you should include clear criteria against which to judge whether progression to the next stage is justified. If you are proposing an evaluation of effectiveness, you should detail any prior scoping, feasibility and/or pilot work and, where appropriate, how the progression criteria of any feasibility and/or pilot study has been met. There are no set progression criteria to use but you should aim to explain whether the uncertainties which need to be addressed have been determined, or how they will be. This will give confidence that a full evaluation is feasible. 

Examples of progression criteria could include (but are not limited to):

  • can/did you recruit people/centres within a reasonable timespan and retain them to follow-up?
  • is/was the intervention sufficiently acceptable and feasible to implement?
  • can the intervention be delivered with reasonable fidelity?
  • do you have commitment to fund the intervention for the duration of the study?
  • can the outcome measures be measured across your target population?
  • is the underlying question still the same/has the context changed?

Please note that the criteria listed above should be used as a guide only. It does not represent a comprehensive list of all the progression criteria that should be included within an application for a feasibility/pilot study. It is also not a comprehensive list for which feasibility will need to be evidenced in an application for an evaluation of effectiveness. 

Evaluation

You should include details of the intervention(s) or policy under evaluation, such as:

  • its components and their frequency and intensity
  • theoretical basis
  • specific techniques used
  • modes of delivery
  • who will deliver the intervention 

You may like to refer to the TiDIER guidance on reporting interventions (Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). Providing a clear description of what is being evaluated or studied is key to justifying the need, value and importance of a study. It is also essential to explain to our Funding Committee how your study design is fit for purpose. We have a broad view on what constitutes an ‘intervention’ or policy under evaluation. 

Logic Model

Please upload a 1 page logic model depicting your theory of change, to help explain the intervention being evaluated.

Control/comparator group

Please state what comparator(s) will be used in your study. Justify its appropriateness for answering the research question, and describe how it will be selected.

Study population

Which population(s) will be the target for the intervention and the participants in the research? How will the population(s) be recruited and retained?

Setting

Where will the research be undertaken and the intervention delivered?

Outcome measures

Please state and justify the primary and secondary outcome measures.

Methods for data collection

For each outcome, process or economic study component proposed, please state the source of the data that will be analysed. Where this is primary data collection, please state the quantitative and/or qualitative method used where appropriate. Where this is secondary data, please describe the characteristics of the dataset and the process by which access will be obtained.

Primary outcomes must be health related. The PHR Programme will accept proxy measures for health as long as they are appropriately defined and the link to health is clearly justified. You are encouraged to consider additional outcome measures including those relating to the broader determinants of health and health inequalities, which should be specified and justified. When describing your approach to health inequalities, please give details of relevant health inequalities related to your study; the nature of the inequality and the definition of the population groups. 

Sample size

Please describe and justify the proposed sample size for each element of the study. Justify the values used in the calculation by giving their source and/or some sensitivity around assumed values.

Data and analysis

Please detail how you will analyse each study data set. Clearly state the purpose of any analysis. You must state the proposed type and frequency of analyses including the selection of participants who will be included in the analyses. Describe any planned interim and sub-group analyses, sensitivity analysis and how missing data will be handled.

Health economics

Understanding the value of public health interventions – whether the outcomes justify their use of resources – is integral to the PHR Programme. The main outcomes for the economic evaluation are expected to include health (including health-related quality of life) and impact on health inequalities, with consideration of broader outcomes welcomed. Your economic evaluation should make clear where resources relate to different economic sectors and budgets. We encourage different approaches to economic evaluation as long as they assess the value and distributive impact of interventions. If your application does not assess distributive impact of interventions or does not include an economic component, you should provide appropriate justification.

Stakeholder engagement

You are strongly encouraged to ensure that a wide range of stakeholders are meaningfully involved in the design and planning of the research and throughout the work. Examples of stakeholders include decision-makers, commissioners, members of the public*, and people with lived experience. You might do this through involving them as costed/rewarded members of the research team. 

*Please note there is a detailed section on public involvement within your study that does not need to be repeated here.

Project timescale and milestones

Please provide a clear indication of the study timescale and dates by which key milestones should be achieved.

Flow Diagram

Please upload a one page flow diagram detailing your study timelines and milestones.

Please state how your study will be managed, and who will manage it. Refer to the roles of specific applicants as appropriate. 

Where applicable, this section should also describe how any conflicts of interest will be managed, such as involving stakeholders with a financial or non-financial interest in the intervention in the study team.

Research governance and ethical approval

Please indicate what research governance issues will need to be addressed in your research and state how you will seek and obtain ethical approval. You must either comply with the research ethics framework formulated by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) or obtain approval via the National Research Ethics Service (NRES).

Please note that we will check all proposals recommended for funding which involve a clinical trial. We check for potential overlaps using WHO trials before we communicate any funding decision. Consequently, a funding recommendation may not be taken forward if a major overlap is identified at this stage. It is therefore important that you highlight any potential overlaps before your application is considered by the Funding Committee. You should then explain how you expect your proposed research will add to the body of knowledge, referring to current policy and practice.

Application process

Find out how to apply for this funding opportunity and what you need to do to get your application ready.

How to apply 

When you are ready to apply, you will need to log in to our application system to apply. This funding opportunity is on our new Awards Management System and you will need to create a new account to apply.

The closing date is 25 April 2025 at 1pm. Applications received after 1pm on the closing date will not be considered. 

Please read the following guidance before submitting an application:  

  • All of the application guidance detailed in the 'Application guidance' section in this funding opportunity

Download application form template

You can download a Word document template of the application form below. Please use this template as a guide only, to help you prepare your application. For example, to see how many characters are accepted in each section and to see how information in the form is laid out. Please do not try to use this as an application form; it cannot be submitted as an application. You must submit your application online via our Awards Management System.

domestic-outline-application-form-template.docx

Research inclusion and reasonable adjustments

At NIHR we are committed to creating a diverse and inclusive culture. We encourage applications from people from all backgrounds and communities bringing diverse skills and experiences. If you need any reasonable adjustments throughout the application process, please contact the programme team via the information in the Contact Details tab.

Research Support Service

Got a research idea and not sure how to turn it into a funding application? The free NIHR Research Support Service (RSS) supports researchers in England to apply for funding. It can help you develop and deliver clinical and applied health, social care and public health research post award. 

Please speak to the NIHR Specialist Centre for Public Health (SCPH) about the design of your research as soon as possible by completing the RSS SCPH online form. A successful application takes a long time (several months) to develop.

Contact Details

  • For help with your application contact phr@nihr.ac.uk
  • For more information about the funding Programme, visit the PHR Page
  • Got a research idea and not sure how to turn it into a funding application? The NIHR Research Support Service (RSS) supports researchers in England to apply for funding, and to develop and deliver clinical and applied health, social care and public health research post award. Find out how the RSS can help you.