Internet Explorer is no longer supported by Microsoft. To browse the NIHR site please use a modern, secure browser like Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Microsoft Edge.
Considered as a percentage of those submitted (B/A)%
53%
66%
60%
Shortlisted by advisory group (C)
16
30
46
Shortlisted as a percentage of those considered by advisory group (C/B)%
44%
56%
51.1%
Funded applications (D)
12
20
32
Funded as percentage of those shortlisted (D/C)%
75%
67%
69.6%
Funded as percentage of those considered by advisory group (D/B)%
33%
37%
35.6%
2019/20 applications
Application stage
Commissioned
Research led
HTA summary
Submitted applications (A)
58
31
89
Considered by advisory group (B)
36
24
60
Considered as a percentage of those submitted (B/A)%
62%
77%
67.4%
Shortlisted by advisory group (C)
18
8
26
Shortlisted as a percentage of those considered by advisory group (C/B)%
50%
33%
43.3%
Funded applications (D)
12
4
16
Funded as percentage of those shortlisted (D/C)%
67%
50%
61.5%
Funded as percentage of those considered by advisory group (D/B)%
33%
17%
26.7%
2018/19 applications
Application stage
Commissioned
Research led
HTA summary
Submitted applications (A)
38
74
102
Considered by advisory group (B)
25
48
73
Considered as a percentage of those submitted (B/A)%
66%
65%
65.2%
Shortlisted by advisory group (C)
6
19
25
Shortlisted as a percentage of those considered by advisory group (C/B)%
24%
40%
34.2%
Funded applications (D)
3
12
15
Funded as percentage of those shortlisted (D/C)%
50%
63%
60%
Funded as percentage of those considered by advisory group (D/B)%
12%
25%
20.5%
2017/18 applications
Application stage
Commissioned
Research led
HTA summary
Submitted applications (A)
52
48
100
Considered by advisory group (B)
38
27
65
Considered as a percentage of those submitted (B/A)%
73%
56%
65%
Shortlisted by advisory group (C)
10
9
19
Shortlisted as a percentage of those considered by advisory group (C/B)%
26%
33%
29.2%
Funded applications (D)
5
5
10
Funded as percentage of those shortlisted (D/C)%
50%
56%
52.6%
Funded as percentage of those considered by advisory group (D/B)%
13%
19%
15.4%
2016/17 applications
Application stage
Commissioned
Research led
HTA summary
Submitted applications (A)
52
56
108
Considered by advisory group (B)
36
34
70
Considered as a percentage of those submitted (B/A)%
69%
61%
64.8%
Shortlisted by advisory group (C)
17
11
28
Shortlisted as a percentage of those considered by advisory group (C/B)%
47%
32%
40%
Funded applications (D)
8
7
15
Funded as percentage of those shortlisted (D/C)%
47%
64%
53.6%
Funded as percentage of those considered by advisory group (D/B)%
22%
21%
21.4%
2015/16 applications
Application stage
Commissioned
Research led
HTA summary
Submitted applications (A)
88
40
128
Considered by advisory group (B)
69
24
93
Considered as a percentage of those submitted (B/A)%
78%
60%
72.7%
Shortlisted by advisory group (C)
22
8
30
Shortlisted as a percentage of those considered by advisory group (C/B)%
32%
33%
32.3%
Funded applications (D)
14
5
19
Funded as percentage of those shortlisted (D/C)%
64%
63%
63.3%
Funded as percentage of those considered by advisory group (D/B)%
20%
21%
20.4%
Please note:
Fast track applications are submitted as a full proposal and undergo a one stage application process.
The data presented are for all calls that were completed during the financial year – a call is only considered to have completed when each application submitted has received a final outcome. Data within a financial year may therefore not reflect calls opened in that year which can result in the overall numbers of applications being inconsistent between years.
These data include both primary research and evidence synthesis applications.
