This document outlines success rates for funding applications to the NIHR Invention for Innovation (i4i) Programme.
2019/20
| Workstream | Connect | PDA | Challenge | Summary |
|---|
| Number of applications submitted (A) |
126 |
232 |
39 |
397 |
| Number of applications that entered the review process and were considered by an advisory committee (B) |
126 |
106 |
20 |
525 |
| Applications considered by an advisory committee as a percentage of those submitted (B/A) |
100% |
46% |
51% |
63% |
| Number of applications shortlisted by an advisory committee (C) |
27 |
27 |
6 |
60 |
| Shortlisted applications as a percentage of the total applications considered by an advisory committee (C/B) |
21% |
25% |
30% |
24% |
| Number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (D) |
27 |
30 |
6 |
63 |
| Number of funded applications (E) |
11 |
19 |
4 |
34 |
| Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (E/D) |
41% |
63% |
67% |
54% |
| Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of applications considered by an advisory committee (E/B) |
9% |
18% |
20% |
13% |
2018/19
| Workstream | Connect | PDA | Challenge | Summary |
|---|
| Number of applications submitted (A) |
102 |
156 |
- |
397 |
| Number of applications that entered the review process and were considered by an advisory committee (B) |
102 |
68 |
- |
252 |
| Applications considered by an advisory committee as a percentage of those submitted (B/A) |
100% |
44% |
- |
63% |
| Number of applications shortlisted by an advisory committee (C) |
25 |
29 |
- |
60 |
| Shortlisted applications as a percentage of the total applications considered by an advisory committee (C/B) |
25% |
43% |
- |
24% |
| Number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (D) |
25 |
26 |
- |
63 |
| Number of funded applications (E) |
9 |
11 |
- |
34 |
| Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (E/D) |
36% |
42% |
- |
54% |
| Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of applications considered by an advisory committee (E/B) |
9% |
16% |
- |
13% |
2017/18
| Workstream | Connect | PDA | Challenge | Summary |
|---|
| Number of applications submitted (A) |
132 |
199 |
20 |
351 |
| Number of applications that entered the review process and were considered by an advisory committee (B) |
132 |
90 |
7 |
229 |
| Applications considered by an advisory committee as a percentage of those submitted (B/A) |
100% |
45% |
35% |
65% |
| Number of applications shortlisted by an advisory committee (C) |
23 |
32 |
2 |
57 |
| Shortlisted applications as a percentage of the total applications considered by an advisory committee (C/B) |
17% |
36% |
29% |
25% |
| Number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (D) |
23 |
31 |
2 |
56 |
| Number of funded applications (E) |
11 |
15 |
1 |
27 |
| Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (E/D) |
48% |
48% |
50% |
48% |
| Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of applications considered by an advisory committee (E/B) |
8% |
17% |
14% |
12% |
2016/17
| Workstream | Researcher led | Challenge | Summary |
|---|
| Number of applications submitted (A) |
199 |
N/A |
199 |
| Number of applications that entered the review process and were considered by an advisory committee (B) |
199 |
N/A |
199 |
| Applications considered by an advisory committee as a percentage of those submitted (B/A) |
100% |
N/A |
100% |
| Number of applications shortlisted by an advisory committee (C) |
34 |
N/A |
34 |
| Shortlisted applications as a percentage of the total applications considered by an advisory committee (C/B) |
29% |
N/A |
29% |
| Number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (D) |
31 |
N/A |
31 |
| Number of funded applications (E) |
15 |
N/A |
15 |
| Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (E/D) |
48% |
N/A |
48% |
| Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of applications considered by an advisory committee (E/B) |
13% |
N/A |
13% |
2015/16
| Workstream | Researcher led | Challenge | Summary |
|---|
| Number of applications submitted (A) |
68 |
19 |
87 |
| Number of applications that entered the review process and were considered by an advisory committee (B) |
68 |
19 |
87 |
| Applications considered by an advisory committee as a percentage of those submitted (B/A) |
100% |
100% |
100% |
| Number of applications shortlisted by an advisory committee (C) |
34 |
8 |
42 |
| Shortlisted applications as a percentage of the total applications considered by an advisory committee (C/B) |
50% |
42% |
48% |
| Number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (D) |
34 |
8 |
42 |
| Number of funded applications (E) |
11 |
11 |
12 |
| Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (E/D) |
32 |
13 |
29 |
| Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of applications considered by an advisory committee (E/B) |
16% |
5% |
14% |
