This site is optimised for modern browsers. For the best experience, please use Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Microsoft Edge.

Invention for Innovation Programme - Success rates

 

Contents

This document outlines success rates for funding applications to the NIHR Invention for Innovation (i4i) Programme.

2019/20

WorkstreamConnectPDAChallengeSummary
Number of applications submitted (A) 126 232 39 397
Number of applications that entered the review process and were considered by an advisory committee (B) 126 106 20 525
Applications considered by an advisory committee as a percentage of those submitted (B/A) 100% 46% 51% 63%
Number of applications shortlisted by an advisory committee (C) 27 27 6 60
Shortlisted applications as a percentage of the total applications considered by an advisory committee (C/B) 21% 25% 30% 24%
Number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (D) 27 30 6 63
Number of funded applications (E) 11 19 4 34
Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (E/D) 41% 63% 67% 54%
Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of applications considered by an advisory committee (E/B) 9% 18% 20% 13%

2018/19

WorkstreamConnectPDAChallengeSummary
Number of applications submitted (A)  102  156  -  397
Number of applications that entered the review process and were considered by an advisory committee (B)  102  68  -  252
Applications considered by an advisory committee as a percentage of those submitted (B/A)  100%  44%  -  63%
Number of applications shortlisted by an advisory committee (C)  25  29  -  60
Shortlisted applications as a percentage of the total applications considered by an advisory committee (C/B)  25%  43%  -  24%
Number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (D)  25  26  -  63
Number of funded applications (E)  9  11  -  34
Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (E/D)  36%  42%  -  54%
Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of applications considered by an advisory committee (E/B)  9%  16%  -  13%

2017/18

WorkstreamConnectPDAChallengeSummary
Number of applications submitted (A)  132  199  20  351
Number of applications that entered the review process and were considered by an advisory committee (B)  132  90  7  229
Applications considered by an advisory committee as a percentage of those submitted (B/A)  100%  45%  35%  65%
Number of applications shortlisted by an advisory committee (C)  23  32  2  57
Shortlisted applications as a percentage of the total applications considered by an advisory committee (C/B)  17% 36%  29%  25%
Number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (D)  23  31  2  56
Number of funded applications (E)  11  15  1  27
Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (E/D)  48%  48%  50%  48%
Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of applications considered by an advisory committee (E/B)  8%  17%  14%  12%

2016/17

WorkstreamResearcher ledChallengeSummary
Number of applications submitted (A) 199 N/A 199
Number of applications that entered the review process and were considered by an advisory committee (B) 199 N/A 199
Applications considered by an advisory committee as a percentage of those submitted (B/A) 100% N/A 100%
Number of applications shortlisted by an advisory committee (C) 34 N/A 34
Shortlisted applications as a percentage of the total applications considered by an advisory committee (C/B) 29% N/A 29%
Number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (D) 31 N/A 31
Number of funded applications (E) 15 N/A 15
Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (E/D) 48% N/A 48%
Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of applications considered by an advisory committee (E/B) 13% N/A 13%

2015/16

WorkstreamResearcher ledChallengeSummary
Number of applications submitted (A) 68 19 87
Number of applications that entered the review process and were considered by an advisory committee (B) 68 19 87
Applications considered by an advisory committee as a percentage of those submitted (B/A) 100% 100% 100%
Number of applications shortlisted by an advisory committee (C) 34 8 42
Shortlisted applications as a percentage of the total applications considered by an advisory committee (C/B) 50% 42% 48%
Number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (D) 34 8 42
Number of funded applications (E) 11 11 12
Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of Stage 2 applications considered by an advisory committee (E/D) 32 13 29
Funded applications as a percentage of the total number of applications considered by an advisory committee (E/B) 16% 5% 14%