HTA Stage 2 guidance notes
This guidance should be used by applicants to the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme, who have either:
- been shortlisted at Stage 1 and asked to submit a Stage 2 application.
- by those applying for a specific call where a single stage, straight to Stage 2 application has been requested as part of the call. Typically for an Evidence Synthesis or Systematic Review topic.
For shortlisted applicants, the fields indicated with an asterisk will be automatically populated in the Stage 2 form with content input to the Stage 1 form. This content is editable and should be updated in line with any changes made to the application following feedback from the funding committee at Stage 1.
Application summary information
Contracting (host) organisation
Please give details of the organisation who will be the contractor if the project is funded. Please note that we expect the CI’s contracting (host) organisation (substantive employer) to act as the contractor. Please also bear in mind that:
- Thought must be given to the most appropriate institution to act as the contractor as part of the application process, as changes are unlikely to be agreed once a funding decision has been made.
- The contractor is expected to respond to annual financial reconciliation exercises, provide the final financial reconciliation statement for the project and to provide ad-hoc requests for financial information during the lifetime of the project. In the unlikely event that a request is made for the contractor to differ from the CI’s contracting (host) institution, the suggested contractor must be able to fulfil these expectations and to do so in the usual time frames.
- In the same way, the contractor is expected to respond to any queries relating to Intellectual Property, commercialisation and benefit realisation.
If you have any queries, please contact email@example.com before submitting your application.
The project title should state clearly and concisely the proposed research. Any abbreviations should be spelled out in full.
Select the appropriate research type. If your proposed project includes any element of primary research, please select ‘Primary Research’. If you are carrying out new analysis of existing data, select ‘Secondary Research’. If you are not sure which category to select, choose the closest match to your project as this can be adjusted later.
Proposed start date
Note this should be from the first of the month, regardless of whether this is a working day or not. Please be realistic about your possible start date taking account of the necessary contracting, and staff recruitment prior to starting your project.
Research duration (months)
Ensure you include sufficient time to complete all aspects of the research including applications for regulatory approvals (where required) and the final report.
This field will automatically populate once you have saved the research duration information.
Total (stage 2) research costs
Automatically populated from detailed budget section.
Total (stage2) NHS support and treatment costs or external (not NHS) intervention costs
Automatically populated from detailed budget section.
Total non-NHS intervention costs
Non-NHS intervention costs include costs incurred in delivering the intervention which would continue to be incurred after the trial, should the intervention become standard care. The figure that should be entered here is the difference between the cost of the intervention and the cost of current standard care. Please note that NIHR have no provision to cover non-NHS intervention costs, and it is the responsibility of the applicant to secure these costs if they are needed. Where applicable a letter from the provider of the intervention costs for the purposes of the study should be supplied.
These are similar to excess treatment costs but they mainly apply to Public Health and Social Care Research. They are unlikely to be applicable to HTA unless the intervention is being delivered outside the NHS (e.g. in school or by a local authority etc).
Administrative contact details
Do you wish us to contact you, the lead applicant, regarding this application? If no, provide administrative contact details (name, post held, department, organisation, contact details and access rights).
Lead, joint lead and co-applicants details / curriculum vitae (CV)
Complete your name, contact details and other requested information.
Please note: You are required to obtain a free unique ORCiD ID number and update your Management Information System (MIS) user profile with this before you can submit your application. By clicking the link ‘View ORCiD record’ you will be taken to the ORCiD website where you will need to register or sign in. Once logged in to ORCiD and following acceptance of terms and conditions, you will be returned to the MIS and the profile field for your ORCiD number will automatically be populated. You will only have to do this once. For a Stage 2 application this is a mandatory requirement.
Specify your (lead applicant) role in this research (Limit: 200 characters)
Explain in addition to your role as Lead Applicant, the role that you will be undertaking in the research, e.g. co-ordination and project management, analysis, methodological input etc.
Lead applicant’s % full-time equivalent (FTE) commitment
Commitment: This refers to the percentage of your time that you will commit to this project.
We recognise and value the varied perspectives that members of the public, patients, service users and carers bring to a project as applicants and encourage their inclusion where appropriate. Please include a clear description of their role and the reasons why a public co-applicant is joining the team. They are not required to provide a full CV (i.e. N/A may be appropriate for Publication Record and Research Grants held). PPI co-applicants should provide a summary of any relevant knowledge, skills and experience that they will draw upon to contribute to this project.
This could include information about:
- Previous or present work (paid or unpaid) with any relevant organisations
- Links with any relevant groups, committees, networks or organisations
- Experience of particular health conditions, treatments, use of services, being a carer - or as a member of a particular community
- Knowledge and experience of research including previous research undertaken
- Knowledge and experience of patient and public involvement including previous involvement activities
- Skills from any other roles that are transferable
- Relevant qualifications, training and learning
For further information please see the 'Public Co-Applicants in Research' guidance.
Research background - lead and co-applicants
Publication record (limit 10,000 characters)
Provide details of a maximum of six of your most recent / relevant publications (in the last 10 years) relevant to this application (using Vancouver or Harvard citation format) listed one after another with a blank line between each one. Please use DOI reference numbers if needed.
Research grants held (limit 10,000 characters)
This should include research grants held (as a named applicant) currently or in the last five years, as well as any additional previous grants, relevant to this application. Please include who the grant is with and the amount of each grant. If no grants are held please enter N/A (as this is a mandatory field). For each entry you should state: registration number and name of registry and the DOI of the main related publication. Where the study is still ongoing or final results have not yet been published, please provide an estimated publication date. This is in-line with the NIHR policy on clinical trial registration and disclosure of results.
History of application - has this application been previously submitted to this or any other funding body? (completed by lead applicant only)
You should include in this section information on whether this or a similar application has been submitted in the past to any NIHR programme or other funder. You should name, and provide dates and outcomes of these. Please indicate whether you hold or have ever held an NIHR programme contract which has been terminated prior to completion, extended in time or in terms of funding.
Select ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ from the drop down box to indicate whether this or a similar application has previously been submitted to this or any other funding body.
For more information about resubmission of a research/trainee funding application, or joint funding please contact the appropriate NIHR research funding programme.
Applications submitted to other NIHR programmes (completed by lead applicant only)
NIHR will not accept the same or substantially similar applications concurrently to more than one NIHR programme. If two similar applications are submitted, once the overlap is identified, the application that is most advanced through the funding process will continue and the second will not be taken further.
Similar applications will only be considered by two NIHR programmes concurrently if:
- the aims and research proposals are substantially different
- if successful, NIHR would be prepared to fund both proposals
- the successful delivery of one project is not dependent on the other
Where this application is currently being considered by another (non NIHR funder) click the ‘Add’ button and complete the necessary information.
We are keen to know if the application has been submitted elsewhere and you must be as open about this as possible. This includes, but is not limited to, any facts that, should they come to light at a future date, would embarrass either the programme or the individual who withheld the fact (e.g. if a member of the team holds a patent or has a financial interest within the research area).
Failure to disclose accurately or fully will be considered by the programme as academic misconduct and treated accordingly.
Joint lead applicant
Please click the ‘Add’ button and select the Joint Lead Applicant Role drop down option and enter their details (if applicable). You are not required to complete the Justification for Joint Lead Applicant boxes on the online form. However, as they are mandatory fields please enter N/A into each box.
Joint lead applicant / co-applicants / co-applicants - PPI
Add details of all co-applicants (including joint lead applicant if applicable) and their specific role in the project. The number of co-applicants is calculated automatically. Do not include collaborators, who should be mentioned (if necessary) in the "detailed research plan" section/upload of the on-line application form.
Co-applicants are those individuals with responsibility for the day to day management and delivery of the project. Co-applicants including public co-applicants, are considered part of the project team and are expected to share responsibility for its successful delivery. In contrast, collaborators normally provide specific expertise on particular aspects of the project but do not share in the responsibility for the delivery of the project.
Guidance for co-applicants to complete their sections.
Your application must be submitted, including the co-applicant’s section by the closing date and time for the call. Please note that any out of offices or undeliverable messages from the co-applicant’s mailbox will be received by an unmonitored email account at NETSCC.
Other supporting roles – signatories (electronic)
Other supporting roles
This is a stage 2 submission requirement only and will not be visible to reviewers of the application form. As a minimum the following (mandatory) supporting roles are required to be added to a stage 2 application:
Administrative authority or finance officer
Head of department or senior manager sponsor
Please note: If you, the lead applicant, are also signing as head of department you should not complete this signatory task until you are ready to submit your application form. Once the lead applicant completes the head of department signatory task, various fields within the application form will become non-editable.
In addition other listed supporting roles should be added as necessary. At the time of adding the necessary supporting roles required to approve your application you are advised to inform the Trust R&D office of the site most likely to be the lead site for your proposed research. The aim is to help speed up the permissions process should your application be successful. Please note this will not apply to all proposals.
Representative of the R&D Function of the devolved country
For research projects originating in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland, we will require evidence of support with regards to NHS support and treatment and/or care costs (where applicable). The nominated signatory for this section should be an authorised person on behalf of the Public Health Agency in Northern Ireland, the NHS Health Scotland or the R&D office in the lead NHS organisation in Wales. By signing the form, the signatory is agreeing that the excess treatment costs and support costs stated in this application appear reasonable.
Each person nominated to a supporting role will be required to tick a check box indicating that they have read and understood the terms on which they have been nominated for this proposal and accept this role. Ticking this box constitutes an electronic signature of the supporting role with regard to this Stage 2 application.
Once the application form is completed and prior to submission the lead applicant is also required to tick a check box to indicate that they have read and understood the terms on which you have been nominated as chief investigator for this proposal along with the associated documentation and accept this role (see acknowledgement section).
No original signatures are required for this application.
Please ensure that the required signatories (above) are aware of the statements of responsibility that they are agreeing to by making an electronic signature. The statements can be found in the terms and conditions.
Scientific abstract (limit 3,500 characters)
The scientific abstract should be a clear and concise scientific summary of the detailed research plan / methods, with a character limit of 3500 (one side of A4 maximum).
The following is a list of potential elements / headings that might be included depending on the design of the proposed research, the setting and programme being applied to, and whether it is for primary research or secondary research. It will be for researchers to decide the appropriate elements to be included in the scientific abstract and could include elements outside this list. Applicants may find the guidance on the EQUATOR Network website useful.
- Research question
- Aims and objectives
- Timelines for delivery
- Anticipated impact and dissemination
Plain English summary of research (limit 3,500 characters)
A plain English summary is a clear explanation of your research.
Many reviewers use this summary to inform their review of your funding application. They include clinicians, other practitioners and researchers who do not have specialist knowledge of your field as well as members of the public. If your application for funding is successful, the summary will be used on National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and other websites.
A good quality plain English summary providing an easy to read overview of your whole study will help:
- Those carrying out the review (reviewers and funding committee members) to have a better understanding of your research proposal
- Inform others about your research such as members of the public, health and social care professionals, policy makers and the media
- The research funders to publicise the research that they fund.
If it is felt that your plain English summary is not clear and of a good quality, then you may be required to amend it prior to final funding approval.
It is helpful to involve patients/ carers/ service users/practitioners and members of the public in developing a plain English summary.
When writing your summary consider including the following information where appropriate:
- Aim(s) of the research
- Background to the research
- Design and methods used
- Patient and public involvement
The plain English summary is not the same as a scientific abstract - please do not cut and paste this or other sections of your application form to create the plain English summary.
Further guidance on writing in plain English is available.
For further support and advice on writing a plain English summary, please contact your local Research Design Service (where applicable).
Changes from first stage (limit 6,000 characters)
Please list all the feedback points received at first stage, in full, and under each indicate what has changed as a result. Please describe and explain any additional changes that have been made to this proposal since the stage 1 application e.g. in the light of new research.
Please note, if you are submitting a one step, straight to stage 2 proposal please ignore this question as it is not applicable to you. If this is the case, please enter ‘not applicable’ in the box.
Patient and public involvement (PPI)
Please describe how patients/service users, carers and the public have been involved in developing this proposal (limit 3,500 characters)
You should describe who has been involved and why this is appropriate, what role(s) they have they played and what influence or change has happened as result of their involvement.
Please describe the ways in which patients/service users, carers and the public will be actively involved throughout the proposed research, including any training and support provided (limit 3,500 characters)
PPI approach, management and support
- Explain why your approach to patient and public involvement is appropriate for this proposal. In your description you will need to say who will be involved and why.
- Please use this opportunity to describe how you plan to manage and coordinate the patient and public involvement activities in your project.
- Describe how you will support and enable patients/service users, carers, the public and members of relevant communities to contribute to your research (e.g. access, payments, training).
- We would also encourage you to outline plans for the capturing, evaluating and reporting the impact of patient and public involvement activities.
Patients, carers, service users and the public can be involved in every stage of a research project, from developing a proposal through to dissemination and evaluation. Further resources to support the design of your PPI.
The role of the PPI lead can be undertaken by any of the co-applicants within the research team (or a named member of the team), who has the relevant skills, experience and authority to be accountable, represent, manage and embed patient and public involvement in all aspects of the research study/programme. This role should be a budgeted and resourced research team member. Examples of the activities a PPI lead might be accountable for.
A summary of PPI activities
Please provide a summary of the proposed PPI activities embedded throughout the research project lifecycle. Please clearly signpost to other sections of the detailed research plan where the PPI is described further in relation to the relevant project stage e.g. dissemination, intervention design, data collection, analysis.
In rare cases where proposals do not involve patients/service users, carers and the public, clear justification must be provided. (limit 3,500 characters)
Complete / justify as necessary.
Justification of costs (limit 8,000 characters)
- Please provide a breakdown of research costs associated with undertaking the research and provide justification for the resources requested. This should include the following costs: staff costs, travel and subsistence, dissemination costs, equipment (including lease versus purchase costs), consumables, patient and public involvement (PPI) and any other direct costs. For help with estimating PPI costs please see the payments guidance.
- When justifying staff costs you should also provide the % amount of time input of each member of staff and link this to the specific area/work package of the proposed study where this input will be taking place.
- You should indicate here how this research will potentially benefit the NHS and/ or public health. For example, where appropriate, describe the likely cost savings or benefits in terms of numbers of patients treated, treatment times, service users or carers supported etc.
- You should describe the value for money of the conduct of the proposed research.
- Please provide a breakdown of the NHS costs associated with undertaking the research and provide justification for the resources required. If there are no NHS support or excess treatment costs associated with the research, you must explain why you think this is the case.
- Please provide a breakdown of any non-NHS intervention costs and provide justification for the resources required. Non-NHS intervention costs should include costs incurred in delivering the intervention which would continue to be incurred after the trial, should the intervention become standard care. Please note that NIHR have no provision to cover non-NHS intervention costs, and it is the responsibility of the applicant to secure these costs if they are needed.
Detailed budget breakdown
The finance section should provide a breakdown of costs associated with undertaking the research as described in the proposal.
The information entered in this section should provide an analysis of the total funds requested to undertake the research proposed and should be based on current prices. These costs will be used to assess value for money.
- It is in the best interest to undertake a thorough, realistic and accurate costing. Where an outline/stage 1 application has been produced and this is the full stage (2) application, the committee/panel will pay close attention to any material increase in costs. You must provide a clear and full justification for all costs including NHS costs. You must also ensure that you include all costs including those required to secure good research management.
- Costs must be provided at current prices. An adjustment for inflation will be made annually thereafter at rates set by the Department of Health and Social Care. Whilst allowances for incremental increases should be included on the form, nationally or locally agreed pay increases should be excluded.
- Years should be calculated starting from the anticipated start date of the proposed research. For example, if your research is expected to start on 01 June 2020 then its second year starts 01 June 2021.
- Further itemisation of costs and methods of calculation may be requested to support the application at a later date.
- Payments will be made to the contracted organisation only and the contracted organisation will be responsible for passing on any money due to their partner organisation(s).
- Payments are not able to made in advance of need and, if funded, your payments will be made in accordance with your application budget. Please therefore ensure that your planned costs are included in the budget year in which they are most likely to be incurred.
- Appropriate sub-contracts must be put in place for any element of the research which is to be paid to another organisation.
- NHS support costs, including costs for social care research are funded via Clinical Research Networks. Researchers should contact their local NHS R&D Department initially and, if they are unable to help directly or if there is no local NHS R&D Department, contact the Local Clinical Research Network Senior Manager for advice on NHS support costs. Further details about LCRN contacts is available.
- All applications are expected to have appropriate NHS, HEI, commercial and other partner organisation input into the finance section of the application form.
- Please note that whilst the applicable percentages will be used to calculate the maximum grant payable, the programme reserves the right to award a grant for less than this maximum where it is considered appropriate.
Costs for un-named co-applicants
If you need to provide costs for more than one unnamed individual it is important to name them as ‘TBA 1’, ‘TBA 2’ etc. not just ‘TBA’, otherwise their costs will not appear in the PDF version of the form.
Information on different types of organisations
Higher Education Institutions (HEIs)
Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) should determine the Full Economic Cost (FEC) of their research using the Transparent Approach to Costing (TRAC) methodology. For HEIs, up to 80% of FEC will be paid, provided that TRAC methodology has been used.
NHS bodies and other providers of NHS services in England
For applications where the contractor is an NHS body or provider of NHS services in England, up to 100% of direct costs will be paid.
Other partner organisations
- If you are a commercial organisation/consultancy, please fill in direct costs and commercial indirect costs. Indirect costs should be charged in proportion to the amount of research staff effort requested on the funding application form. Up to 100% of costs will be paid.
- If you are an ‘other partner’ organisation (e.g. charity or NGO), please fill in direct costs and other partner organisations indirect costs. Indirect costs should be charged in proportion to the amount of research staff effort requested on the funding application form. Up to 100% of costs will be paid.
These are costs that are specific to the research, which will be charged as the amount actually spent and can be supported by an audit record. They should comprise:
I) Posts and salaries summary
This section presents an overview of salary and associated on-costs for the applicant(s) contributing to the research, including normal salary increments broken down individually.
Please include all members of staff working on the research by clicking ‘add a new staff member’ or editing a current one. If there are any applicant(s) whose costs are not being claimed you should still include their details within this section, but don’t include any actual costs. Where applicants are already in receipt of NIHR funding for any part of their salaries (e.g. NIHR Fellowships), these should not be additionally charged to the project. Where applicants are already receiving salaries funded by NIHR, these should be declared in the application - - please note that the NIHR will not fund more than 100% of an applicant’s time across multiple NIHR projects/awards and this fact will be checked prior to contracting. If you are unsure about this requirement or have any questions please contact the appropriate NIHR research funding programme.
The Apprenticeship Levy can be included in the salary costs from 1 April 2017 where relevant.
II) Apply to years
This section specifies the annual costs of each applicant contributing to the research. You should now allocate the individual staff member costs to each year of the research, allowing for increments. Use current rates of pay, and build in any known annual increments (again at current rates). You will not be able to claim for pay awards retrospectively, once your research is underway.
Please note the ‘Total Salary’ column figures need to be calculated using the current annual costs, % FTE and number of months. If the research lasts for several years and an individual’s involvement varies over the course, it may be necessary to explain fully in the justification of costs section the % FTE and months per year for an individual staff member.
It is important to double check that the % FTE, total months and yearly costs information are consistent with the information presented in ‘Details of Posts and Salaries’ (‘Details of Posts and Salaries’ should show the full current staff costs independent of % FTE etc., whereas the yearly costs in ‘Annual Costs of Posts’ depend on % FTE etc.).
Please ensure that you check the ‘Type of Cost’ box which describes the employing organisation for a member of staff as this impacts on the level of funding provided. Staff employed by a Higher Education Institution (HEI) are funded at 80% of cost and staff employed by NHS, commercial or other partner organisation at up to 100% of cost.
Please note that this section also includes ‘Shared Staff Costs’ which is located under directly allocated costs in some other funders’ applications. These are costs of an institution’s research resources which can be charged to the research on the basis of estimated use, rather than actual costs. These may include: IT technicians, laboratory staff, and costs of pooled staff efforts. HEI indirect costs cannot be claimed on these shared costs.
III) Travel, subsistence and dissemination costs
This section includes journey costs, subsistence and dissemination costs, including conference fees and open access publication costs. Where applicable, you will need to include the travel and subsistence costs of your project advisory group, steering committee and/or data monitoring and ethics committee. Travel and subsistence costs relating to dissemination should also be included here, as should costs relating to overseas travel.
Journey costs - Enter the total cost of transport for all journeys for destination/purpose. If travel is by car, apply your institution’s mileage rates (however this should not exceed HMRC approved mileage allowance payments, which is 45p per mile for the first 10,000 miles and 25p thereafter). Travel by the most economic means possible is encouraged. NIHR programmes do not usually fund first class travel.
Subsistence - Subsistence covers accommodation (if necessary) and meals associated with the travel, excluding any alcoholic beverages.
- Conferences - Where national or international conference costs are included, a statement naming the conference or purpose of travel and the benefit to the research must also be made; failure to adequately justify your attendance at a conference, will mean the programme will not fund this cost. For research of up to five years, the programme will usually fund up to a maximum of two individuals to attend one international conference attendance, or one individual to attend two international conferences. For research beyond five years, the programme will usually fund up to a maximum of two international conference attendances per five year or part of five-year research period.
- Open access costs -During the course of your project and throughout review and publishing phase you may choose to submit an article based on your research to an Open Access publication. Depending on the publication you may be subject to an article processing charge (APC). APC rates vary but are usually within the range of £300 and £3000. Open Access publications usually list their APC rates on their websites.Where possible you should include an estimate for any APC in your funding application, since NIHR expects that APCs will be covered by the funding award.
- Other dissemination costs -Any large costs should be further detailed with a breakdown of constituent parts or a timescale profile of the costs. Meetings to share best practice, training events and events to disseminate research findings must be run at the lowest possible cost with minimal catering. ‘Conferences’ which are described as such are not eligible for funding.
Essential items of equipment plus maintenance and related costs not included as part of estates should be input in this section. These can be lease or purchase costs. The purchase cost of pieces of equipment, valued up to £5,000 excluding VAT, will be considered.
Pieces of equipment costing more than £5,000 to purchase will usually need to be leased. Where applicants are leasing equipment with a purchase price of more than £5,000, a comparison of leasing verses purchasing costs must be provided in the ‘Justification of Costs’ section.
Items of equipment valued at £250 or more must be itemised separately; however, grouping same type equipment is permitted. Costs of computers are normally restricted to a maximum of £1000 each to include VAT and any associated software. A statement of justification must be included, in the relevant ‘Justification of Costs’ section for any purchase above this limit.
Equipment must exclude VAT, but if your organisation is unable to reclaim/recover the VAT on a piece of equipment, you should check the box ‘VAT cannot be reclaimed’.
You will need to seek expert advice from the organisation purchasing the equipment regarding its VAT status. If you check the ‘VAT cannot be reclaimed’ column, VAT at 20% will automatically be calculated into the overall cost of that item.
This section includes non-reusable items specific to the research. Please itemise and describe the requirements fully (e.g. postage, stationery, photocopying). These items should be research specific, not just general office costs which should be covered by indirect costs.
VI) Patient and public involvement
Please itemise and describe fully the costs associated with patient and public involvement. These are likely to include individual travel, out of pocket expenses, payment for time and any relevant training and support costs. Costs related to study participants should not be itemised here.
If voluntary, charity or community groups are supporting the research via activities such as facilitating contact with potential participants, contracting research activities or providing advice, an adequate budget must be included to compensate for their time and resources.
VII) Other direct costs
These are costs, not identified elsewhere, that are specifically attributed to the research. For example, costs associated with the use of research facilities, external consultancy costs, costs associated with inclusivity (which may include, but are not limited to justified translation of research participant material into other relevant languages), computer licensing, recruitment and advertising costs. Please note that for organisations claiming indirect/overhead costs, costs such as recruitment of staff, and general training (e.g. in common IT packages) are costs that should be covered by the indirect costs element of the award being sought and should not appear in this section.
If external consultancy costs are included in this section they must be fully justified in the ‘Justification of Costs’ section. Please specify the hourly rate and the number of hours and note that consultants must not be people who are already employed by the applicant’s institution. If they are, any costs should be entered as direct costs in the ‘Details of Posts and Salaries’ and ‘Annual Costs of Posts’ sections.
Indirect costs will be charged in proportion to the amount of research staff effort requested on the award. Commercial/other partner organisations should calculate them, using their own cost rates.
- General office and basic laboratory consumables
- Premises costs
- Library services/learning resources
- Finance, personnel, public relations and departmental services
- Usage costs of major research facilities
- Central and distributed computing
- Charge out rates for shared equipment
- Cost of capital employed
NHS bodies or other providers of NHS services indirect costs
NHS indirect costs cannot be claimed through NIHR/DH programme funding. NHS bodies or other providers of NHS services have been allocated NIHR Research Capability Funding (RCF) to contribute to the cost of hosting NIHR/DH-supported research.
HEI indirect costs
Total Higher Education Institution (HEI) indirect costs must be fully justified. HEIs are permitted to claim estate and other indirect costs. These costs are calculated on the basis of TRAC methodology. Proposals from other types of institutions/organisations should leave this section blank.
HEI indirect costs are based on the number of full-time equivalent research staff working on the research and the indirect/estates charges set by an institution. Please note HEI indirect costs cannot be claimed on shared staff costs. Where staff from more than one HEI are working on the research there may be different indirect/estates charges for each one. Please list each institution on a separate line.
The applicant(s) should consult their HEI finance departments for the appropriate figures to include in the estate charges and other indirect cost sections
Commercial/other partner organisation indirect costs
Commercial/other partner organisations can claim indirect costs which are the costs of resources used by the research that are shared by other activities. Please seek advice from your finance department about the appropriate cost for this section. Total commercial/other partner organisation indirect costs must be fully justified.
NHS support and treatment costs (incl. excess treatment costs/savings)
The finance section includes a section that asks researchers to provide an estimate of the patient care costs associated with the research (if applicable). An explanation of why these costs are being incurred and the basis on which the estimations have been made should be fully detailed under the relevant ‘Justification of Costs’ section.
The committee/panel will take NHS support and treatment costs into account when considering the value for money of the research. It is important that you consider these costs and discuss them with the NHS bodies or providers of NHS services involved, in order to avoid any delay in starting the research.
Please be aware that the research award does not include NHS support and/or treatment costs.
Please note that as part of the work to address the issues surrounding the way in which excess treatment costs are funded, new arrangements are now being implemented as part of a pilot. To underpin the new arrangements, a cost attribution tool has been created by the Health Research Authority (HRA) in partnership with charity funders and research sponsors.
This tool provides a standardised approach across England, ensuring that the attribution of study activities complies with the Department of Health and Social Care Guidance on Attributing the Costs of Health and Social Care Research and Development (AcoRD). As part of their funding applications, researchers are required to complete this new tool, known as a Schedule of Events Cost Attribution Tool (SoECAT) for clinical research, which has been developed from the current HRA Schedule of Events. This tool is designed to capture the different costs associated with clinical research and attribute them accordingly. The totals for excess treatment costs and NHS support costs calculated by using the SoECAT can be entered directly into the application form.
Researchers and/ or their study teams and research sponsor/ lead NHS provider (e.g. R&D office/ Clinical Trial Unit) are supported by AcoRD Specialists in the Local CRN, to verify the accuracy of the SoECAT. For more information please see the NIHR CRN Routemap.
Under the new arrangements, sign off via the LCRN AcoRD Specialist is required to confirm the study attribution complies with the Department of Health and Social Care AcoRD guidance. This early attribution support will underpin the excess treatment cost management process by providing formal sign off, supporting the role of the research sponsor and lead R&D office or Clinical Trial Unit. Completion of the Schedule of Events Cost Attribution Tool will be required for studies eligible for the NIHR portfolio and the support this provides, which will include access to excess treatment cost payments under the new arrangements. This ETC value, alongside recruitment activity in the NIHR Central Portfolio Management System, will then be utilised to inform the payments to NHS providers.
Please note: Social care studies are eligible for Clinical Research Network (CRN) support, it does not just apply to NHS based research, and researchers should speak to the CRN and include support costs where relevant. For the purposes of social care studies ‘treatment costs’ should be interpreted as ‘intervention costs’ and should be included in the proposal when needed. Further guidance on SoECAT, support, and excess treatment costs.
If a project is to be registered with the NIHR portfolio, a completed Schedule of Events Cost Attribution Tool (SoECAT) is required to be uploaded and submitted as part of the application submission.
I) NHS support costs
These are the additional patient care costs associated with the research, which would end once the R&D activity in question has stopped, even if the patient care service involved continues to be provided. These might cover items such as extra patient tests, extra in-patient days and extra nursing attention. Researchers should contact their local NHS R&D Department initially and, if they are unable to help directly or if there is no local NHS R&D Department, contact the Local Clinical Research Network Senior Manager for advice on NHS Support Costs. Further information about Local Clinical Research Networks.
II) NHS treatment costs
NHS guidance on the funding of excess treatment costs prior to completing your application.
These are the patient care costs that would continue to be incurred if the patient care service in question continued to be provided after the R&D activity has stopped. In determining NHS treatment costs, you must assume that the patient care service being assessed will continue even though there may be no plans for it to do so. Where patient care is being provided which differs from the normal, standard, treatment for that condition (either an experimental treatment or a service in a different location from where it would normally be given), the difference between the total treatment costs and the costs of the “usual standard care" (if any) constitutes excess treatment cost/saving, but is nonetheless part of the treatment cost, not an NHS support or research cost. These costs should be determined in conjunction with your NHS body or provider of NHS services and their commissioners.
Please note if the patient care intervention under investigation is in addition to usual care there is no need to complete the ‘Usual Treatment Costs’ section however this will need to be justified in the relevant ‘Justification of Costs’ section. If the patient care intervention under investigation either wholly or partially replaces usual care, the ‘Usual Treatment Costs’ section must be completed.
For further information, please see the attributing the costs of health and social care research and development guidance on Gov.uk.
Management and governance
Is clinical trials authorisation required?
Yes / No
Does your project require ethics approval?
Yes / No
If yes, has ethics approval already been obtained?
Yes / No
Any additional, not requested, documents will not be considered by the funding committee during its review. However, there may be other requested documents e.g. cover letter, collaborative documents, dictated by the specification of the call.
Attachment 1: detailed research plan
It is mandatory to upload and submit a detailed research plan (DRP), which is a full account of the proposed project. Broadly, the detailed research plan should follow the following format:
Use Arial font size 11
- Not exceed 20 A4 pages
- Have a header containing your allocated project reference number if known
- Have a footer showing your page numbers
- Be converted to a .PDF version before uploading it
Headings / guidance
Full title of project
This section should clearly state what the proposed research is and any abbreviations should be defined.
Summary of research (abstract)
Please provide an expert summary of the project plan of investigation plus any additional points required to support statements made in the above sections, and include any key references required to justify the points made (e.g. in the use of particular outcome measures or methods of analysis).
Background and rationale
This section should include a brief literature review of published evidence as well as a review of ongoing research, outlining what is already known and research that is currently underway. Applicants should outline the methods that they have used to do this review and list databases searched and search terms used.
All proposals recommended for funding which involve a clinical trial will be double-checked for potential overlaps using WHO trials before the communication of any funding decision. Consequently, a funding recommendation may not be taken forward if a major overlap is identified at this stage. It is therefore important that applicants highlight any potential overlaps prior to consideration by the funding committee.
Applicants should then explain how they expect that the research proposed will add to the body of knowledge with reference to current NHS policy and practice.
Evidence explaining why this research is needed now
Indicate the necessity for the research, both in terms of time and relevance.
Aims and objectives
Please summarise the key aims and objectives of your project and provide a concise statement of the proposed research.
Research plan / methods
Outline the design of your research including the methods you plan to use; the target organisations, staff groups/professions, patient care group, service users, carers or disease area to be studied and brief details of the team involved in undertaking the research. Please ensure your fieldwork and methods are clearly connected to the aims and objectives and research questions you outlined earlier.
Applicants may apply for up to £10,000 funding to evaluate alternative ways of managing trials and may complete these as part of their main study. Any study within a trial (SWAT) proposed should represent a very minor element of a larger trial and must not interfere with the main trial.
Applicants who intend to do a SWAT must provide a brief description of the SWAT, the methodological approach proposed, expected outcomes, justification for the inclusion of the SWAT and the choice of SWAT intervention in the ‘Detailed Research Plan’.
Before including a SWAT in an application, applicants should firstly check for overlaps on the Northern Ireland Network for Trials Methodology Research website which provides a register of ongoing current SWATs. If the application is funded the applicants must apply for registration of their SWAT on the Northern Ireland MRC Trials Hub for Methodology Research SWAT registry.
The findings of the SWAT must be made publicly available as soon as possible after the end of the SWAT (which may be before the end of the main trial). This can be in a standalone peer reviewed publication, but a full description of all SWATs undertaken must also be included in the NIHR Journal Library publication.
Given the available sample size will be set by the main trial, many SWATs are likely to be underpowered. All SWATs will therefore need to be designed to include potential for meta-analysis and this must be considered within the dissemination strategy.
Multiple Long-Term Conditions (MLTC) – Studies within a project
Applicants may apply for up to £30,000 to do a study within a project (SWAP) that aims to improve understanding of the MLTC perspectives of their projects if this is appropriate. Applicants who are applying for funding for a MLTC SWAP must provide a brief description of the SWAP including:
- The gap in knowledge which the proposed SWAP would address
- How the context of the project warrants a MLTC SWAP
- How the learning from a SWAP will be generalisable to other projects
- Details of how the proposed SWAP builds on existing knowledge
Internal pilot or feasibility studies progression criteria
If your project includes a pilot or feasibility stage, please provide a table outlining the progression criteria, including those in the table below.
Proposed length of internal pilot phase: XX months
|Trial recruitment % complete||0%||0%||100%|
|Recruitment rate/ site/ month||n/n/n||n/n/n||n/n/n|
|Number of sites opened||n||n||n|
|Total number of participants recruited||n||n||n|
If due to the nature of your study the measures in the table are inappropriate, please specify others and fully justify your choice. You may find the article from BMJ Open: Internal pilot or feasibility studies progression criteria useful in determining your progression criteria.
Health technologies being assessed
Give a clear definition of the health technology to be assessed. The purpose of Health Technology Assessment is to assess the value of a health technology compared to best alternatives or, where none exists, against no intervention. Where there are established alternative technologies, these should also be defined carefully. Where the technology is subject to rapid change, details of how this will be dealt with in the project should be included.
Search strategy (in the case of projects involving evidence synthesis)
Provide details of the body of existing evidence that will be covered and access arrangements (e.g. use of databases, hand-searching, communication with authors, etc.). The databases you wish to use need to be specified as well as plans to address any issues in respect of data linkage.
Review strategy and strategy for reviewing literature (in the case of projects involving evidence synthesis)
Explain the criteria to be applied to assess the quality and relevance of studies identified by the search strategy. Provide an explanation of how these will be decided if they are not yet known. Describe your methods for combining, aggregating or synthesising research findings and different forms of evidence.
Design and theoretical/conceptual framework
Please provide a brief statement on the type of study design to be used, and the theoretical framing, concepts and models to be used.
Please describe for all projects your approach and rationale for sampling or selecting research sites and subjects. For quantitative studies, if appropriate, state the required sample size, giving details of the estimated effect, size, power and/or precision employed in the calculation where applicable. You should also provide estimations of recruitment and retention rates.
Define the population from which the study sample receives the health technology concerned (or the control intervention where appropriate) e.g. women over 60, people with learning disability, people with advanced cancer.
Summary of patients/service users/carers/public as research participants
The successful recruitment and retention of study participants is strategically important for the NIHR. If your proposed study involves patients/service users/carers/public as research participants please use the following bullet points to summarise their characteristics and what would be expected of them throughout the research project lifecycle. The potential burden on study participants can then be understood as well as whether or not the proposed strategies are practical, inclusive and feasible. Please also signpost to where further information on these points can be found in the detailed research plan and application.
Points to cover:
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria to help ensure that certain groups were not being excluded without justification
- Recruitment method and consent process to ensure it is practical and fair
- Type and content of participant information materials
- Overview of research methods to capture data from participants and their frequency e.g. questionnaires/tests/intervention/focus groups/ interviews
- Study participant support to consider how drop-out and issues of participation would be handled/helplines/ other access arrangements required
- Methods for sharing study progress and findings with study participants
- Payments, rewards and recognition for study participants.
Guidance for applicants on equality, diversity and inclusion for study participants
Every person eligible to take part in research should be offered the same opportunity of taking part in that research regardless of:
- Geographical location
- Gender reassignment
- Marriage and civil partnership
- Pregnancy and maternity
- Ethnicity - see the toolkit for increasing participation of BAME groups in health and care research and the INCLUDE Ethnicity Framework, which aims to improve trial delivery for under-served groups.
- Religion or belief
- Sexual orientation
- Socioeconomic status
- Access to health or social care
All NIHR applications are expected to include information about how this data will be collected. In addition applicants should demonstrate how these factors have been considered and addressed in their proposal, including steps taken to ensure the research sample is representative of the population the study is targeted at. Applicants need to explain who they are planning to recruit to ensure inclusivity of study participants and justify and explain any exclusions, for example by completing an Equality Impact Assessment. Costs associated with inclusivity, which may include, but are not limited to justified translation of research participant material into other relevant languages, would be expected and where appropriate should be included in the detailed budget section under ‘Other Direct Costs’. Additionally, applicants should demonstrate that all potential recruiting locations have been considered and the research is deliverable to those areas.
The NIHR supports the Researcher Development Concordat which recognises the critical role of research and innovation in delivering the UK’s ambitious economic and industrial strategies, and aims to set the gold standard in researcher development and use it as a competitive advantage. NIHR research applicants should understand the concordat and consider this when completing their application.
Other helpful links: Promoting equality, diversity and inclusion in research.
Please provide a detailed explanation of the inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Please describe the health or social care service setting or context in which the study will take place (such as the organisation or service type).
Please describe the data you plan to collect. Depending upon your study design and methodology, you may need to explain what data collection instruments or measures you plan to use, and whether you will be using instruments already developed and tested elsewhere or instruments which you develop as part of this project. For example, where cost or outcome data is to be collected, you need to make clear and justify your approach to defining and measuring the costs or outcomes in question. You should make clear the link between the data collected and the research questions outlined earlier.
Please describe how you plan to analyse the data you have collected. Depending upon your study design and methodology, you may need to explain what quantitative statistical methods you plan to employ, your methods for qualitative data analysis, and your approach to combining data from multiple methods or sources.
Measurement of costs and outcomes
Not all HTA studies require full economic evaluations. When considering inclusion of a cost effectiveness analysis, applicants should carefully describe what this will add to the study. Where an economic component is proposed, applicants should endeavour to use the simplest approach, or fully justify where more complex methodologies are needed. Details should include justification of the use of outcome measures where a legitimate choice exists between alternatives. If the study includes a health economic component, state from what perspective costs and benefits will be considered, and (briefly) how these will be collected.
- Where established Core Outcomes exist they should be included amongst the list of outcomes unless there is good reason to do otherwise. Find out more at the COMET Initiative website.
Dissemination, outputs and anticipated impact
The purpose of this section is for the applicant to describe the planned outputs of the research, how these will be communicated and to who, and how the research may lead to short and longer-term impacts. NIHR understands that the impact of any research may take time to be realised and will likely involve other funders, institutions and sustained efforts in practice. NIHR also recognises it may be difficult to provide definitive answers or guarantees on longer term impacts. However, applicants are invited below to consider various aspects of pathways below and how the likelihood of impact can be maximised. This includes considering what outputs are produced, how these can be best connected to the health and/or social care environment, what efforts and investment are likely to be needed beyond the project, what barriers are likely to be encountered and what impacts the research is seeking to achieve.
What do you intend to produce from your research?
Please provide brief details of each anticipated output. NB the term ‘outputs’ refers to any tangible product of the research, not just academic publications. Outputs can include but are not limited to:
- conference presentation or other workshop events
- publications (academic or otherwise)
- guidelines (clinical, service or otherwise)
- other copyright (e.g. questionnaires, training aids, toolkits, manuals, software, etc.)
- new or improved design of medical devices or instrumentation
- new or improved diagnostic
- trial data that could be used to support a CE mark, market authorisation or equivalent
- trial data that could be used to shape or influence a healthcare market or government
- potential new drug or health or social care intervention.
How will you inform and engage patients/service users, carers, NHS, social care organisations and the wider population about your work?
Describe who you need to communicate with within this research, and your plans for engaging relevant audiences. For impact, it is unlikely that simply making outputs available will be sufficient. Please consider and outline the active approach you will take to engaging key parties or identify the process you will use to identify them and formulate an engagement plan. NIHR Dissemination guidance: How to disseminate your research: Getting your message heard.
How will your outputs enter our health and care system or society as a whole?
Describe the process by which the research will enter the health and/or social care environment, including how your outputs will be acknowledged, selected and introduced for use in the health and care service or wider society. Where possible consider how the work will be able to be adopted and implemented longer term. Please describe the proposed route to market (commercial or non-commercial) for your outputs. Describe who is needed to take it forward and the relationship you currently (or propose to) have with these parties. If your outputs are likely to be commercially exploitable, please include details on how you plan to develop this.
What further funding or support will be required if this research is successful (e.g. From NIHR, other Government departments, charity or industry)?
Consider what investment or support may be needed at the end of this project to maximise impact. Not all projects will require this but if so, plans should be linked to the responses in points 2 and 3 above.
What are the possible barriers for further research, development, adoption and implementation?
Describe the difficulties which may be faced in generating impact from your research. These may be difficulties you will face yourself, or challenges faced by those in the implementing context (e.g. clinicians).
- Will the proposed research use data, technology, materials or other inventions that are subject to any form of intellectual property protection (e.g. copyright, design rights, patents) or rights owned by another organisation(s)? If yes, provide brief details including how such third-party IP will be accessed (e.g. collaboration agreement, drug supply agreement).
- What are the key current and future barriers to uptake of any likely output or innovation directly in the health and care service, through commercial exploitation or other means, e.g. potential regulatory hurdles?
- What are the challenges for getting your research implemented in terms of acceptability, accessibility and feasibility? How will you address these?
What do you think the impact of your research will be and for whom?
Describe the impacts you aim to achieve as a direct result of the project and those which are anticipated longer term. Please consider how any smaller, more immediate effects may mature over time into larger scale or more significant effects, and the steps by which this may be achieved. As far as possible, indicate anticipated timescales for these benefits and a quantitative estimate of their scale. Impacts may include but are not restricted to:
- patient/service user/carer benefit
- healthcare/social care staff benefits
- changes in NHS or care services (including efficiency savings)
- commercial return (which could contribute to economic growth)
- public wellbeing
How will you share with study participants the progress and findings of your research?
What strategies will you use to keep your research participants informed of the progress of your project and the findings? Consider the ethical implications of informing study participants and also what the most accessible methods could be, such as newsletters, leaflets, webpages, social media and where relevant different languages and formats. The Health Research Authority provide guidance on the information participants of trials should receive at the end of the study.
Project / research timetable
Please provide a concise summary here of the project plan of investigation, preferably in the form of a monthly project timetable showing the scheduling of all key stages in the project, their expected durations, and the timing of key milestones throughout the project including the production of outputs.
Please ensure your timings (e.g. time allowed for securing ethics/governance approval, for undertaking data collection and analysis, and for reporting and writing up) are realistic.
This timetable will be an important aspect of the monitoring framework during the life of the project.
If your application is successful, you will be required to submit progress reports, usually every six months. Where appropriate, these progress reports will be based on the project timetable and milestones. If you are late producing progress reports or a single draft final report of the expected standard for the programme, we may withhold payments, in accordance with our retention policy.
All project proposals should include details of how the project will be managed. For projects involving a number of institutions or component parts, effective project management is essential to ensure the work is completed within the planned timeframe. You should set out how joint applicants in different institutions will communicate and monitor progress of the project.
Outline any ethical and/or other regulatory issues, and arrangements for handling them. If there are no plans to obtain ethical review, this must be clearly justified. (Note that work outlined in your application/protocol must adhere to the UK Framework for Health and Social Care research).
Project / research expertise
Outline the particular contribution each member of the team will make to the project and the particular contribution that collaborators are intended to make. In addition, please give details of supervision arrangements for junior staff involved.
You should outline staff numbers and grades, timescales, equipment purchases, etc. that you are requesting funding for. If you propose to purchase expensive medical or other equipment, justify fully why you are not proposing to lease it, since this is the DH preferred option.
If applicable you must also provide an explanation and justification of the NHS support costs and excess treatment costs associated with this proposal including, if applicable, an explanation of the basis on which these NHS costs have been estimated.
There should be a named person with appropriate skills and experience who is responsible for leading the PPI element within the project. This role should be an adequately costed and resourced research team member who is able to manage the PPI plans and related activities. Examples of the activities a PPI lead might undertake.
Success criteria and barriers to proposed work
Please set out the measurements of success you intend to use, the risks to the proposed research and how you intend to mitigate against them.
Attachment 2: CTU support letter (if required / appropriate to the study) not a mandatory field
If appropriate to the study, please supply and upload a CTU letter of support. If your CTU is supporting a number of studies to HTA calls, they can submit a single letter of support listing all of them, rather than prepare individual letters.
Attachment 3: flow diagram
In order to submit a Stage 2 application to the programme you must upload a diagram (single-side of A4), as a separate .PDF file, for submission with your application form. This diagram will be projected at the funding committee meeting to provide funding committee members with a visual summary of the study proposed.
The diagram should illustrate the study design and the flow of participants (if appropriate). If the project consists of more than one work package, consider a diagram that conveys the sequence and timing of research packages as well as how the work packages are linked.
Please ensure diagrams are large and clear enough for them to be projected as a slide at the funding committee meeting.
If proposing an RCT, we advise you refer to the CONSORT statement and website for guidance. If the commissioning brief requests a pilot or feasibility trial please refer to the consort extension for pilot and feasibility trials. Alternatively, you may also find the EQUATOR Network website useful.
Attachment 4: references (maximum 3 pages of A4)
List all references cited in the full project description, using either the Vancouver or Harvard referencing conventions, and include the DOI of the main related publication.
Attachment 5: Schedule of Events Cost Attribution Tool (SoECAT)
A completed Schedule of Events Cost Attribution Tool (SoECAT) is now required to be uploaded and submitted for projects that are to be registered with the NIHR portfolio. Please note that although the on line application form / MIS states that the SoECAT upload is not a required upload this should be ignored (where appropriate), this is a system management rule to enable an application to be submitted where SoECAT sign-off may be delayed.
Acknowledge, review and submit
Please declare any conflicts or potential conflicts of interest that you or your co-applicants may have in undertaking this research, including any relevant, non-personal & commercial interest that could be perceived as a conflict of interest. If in doubt, you should err on the side of disclosure.
For HTA commissioned topics, the Programme strongly discourages the practice of the same co-applicant joining more than one competing team. There may be unusual circumstances where the same person could be included on more than on application e.g. a lead from a named charity or a unique national expert in a condition.
For such exceptions (i) each application needs to state the case as to why the same person is included (ii) the shared co-applicant should not divulge application details between teams and (iii) both teams should acknowledge in their application that they are aware that one of their co-applicants is part of a competing application and that study details have not been shared.
Agreement to terms and conditions
I have read and understood the terms on which I have been nominated as Chief Investigator for this proposal along with the associated documentation and accept this role. Terms and conditions for the use of the NIHR Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre's Management Information System.
Equality and Diversity Monitoring Information
NIHR is committed to promoting equality, diversity and inclusion in research and asks applicants to provide Equality and Diversity Monitoring Information (age, sex, ethnicity and race, and disability). By answering these Equality and Diversity Monitoring Information questions, you will help us to better understand the different groups of people that apply to us for funding and their experiences of the funding process – particularly the groups protected by UK equality legislation. Although it is mandatory to answer these questions, it is possible to select “prefer not to say” as a response. However, the more information you provide, the more effective our monitoring will be. This information will not be used to make decisions about funding.
Checklist of information to include when submitting an NIHR stage 2 research application
Applicants should click the check boxes to indicate that they have included the necessary information prior to submitting their application.
- Appropriate and relevant involvement of patients/service users, carers and the public
- A good quality Plain English Summary
- A clear description of team member roles and contribution
- A clear scientific abstract
- A clear description of the changes from first stage (if applicable)
- A flow diagram illustrating the study design / flow of participants (document upload)
- A full and accurate detailed budget breakdown
- A clear justification of costs / value for money
- References (maximum 3 pages of A4 - document upload)
- A clear Detailed Research Plan outlining the study design, methods, dissemination etc. (document upload)
- A CTU letter of support if required (document upload)
- The support and agreement from the necessary supporting roles / signatories
- A completed and approved SoECAT